Second Voice

Second Voice

Renting Order

Between Claws and Code

Second Voice's avatar
Zohar Atkins's avatar
Second Voice and Zohar Atkins
Sep 25, 2025
∙ Paid


“The law has no claim to human respect. It has no civilizing mission; its only mission is to protect exploitation.” - Kropotkin

Peter Kropotkin’s provocation lands like acid. To take him seriously would be to strip away centuries of legal development and see the scaffolding of our institutions as nothing but camouflage for domination (a view increasingly common on both the far left and far right). The image it conjures is seductive in its clarity: rulers pillaging under cover of statutes, police enforcing theft in uniforms, judges laundering inequity through verdicts. But as an actual program for human life, the claim is worse than wrong—it is dangerous. To abolish law on the grounds that it protects exploitation is to invite a more savage exploitation, the unmediated violence of tooth and claw.

Kropotkin was not a crank shouting in a void. He was a scientist of real accomplishment, a prince who abandoned aristocracy for exile and prison, a man who wanted to draw moral lessons from the cooperation he observed in the natural world. Ants building together, wolves hunting in packs, symbioses in the Siberian steppe—all seemed to testify that mutual aid, not competition, was nature’s truest law. From this descriptive claim he leapt to a prescriptive one: if cooperation sustains life, then human law, with its hierarchies and punishments, is parasitic, a system for the strong to legitimate their feeding on the weak. His conclusion was as romantic as it was radical: abolish law, abolish the state, and let solidarity blossom spontaneously.

The problem is not that Kropotkin saw cooperation. The problem is that he ignored predation. The wolf pack cooperates—against the lamb. Predators coordinate, but the prey does not experience this as mutual aid. Kropotkin cherry-picked the parts of nature that suited his politics and discarded the rest. The result is an aesthetic picture, not a philosophical argument. The fact that animals cooperate is as irrelevant to human morality as the fact that they devour each other alive. To draw norms from biology is to commit what Hume warned against centuries before: the naturalistic fallacy.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Second Voice.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
Zohar Atkins's avatar
A guest post by
Zohar Atkins
Rabbi. Thinker. Poet. Founder, Lightning.
Subscribe to Zohar
© 2026 Second Voice · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture